Starboard's February 2019 letter to Bristol-Myers Squibb shareholders on the Celgene deal
- Written by
- Jeffrey C. Smith
- Organisation
- Starboard Value
- Filed
- 28 Feb 2019
- Sector
- Pharmaceuticals
Read the original at sec.gov (opens in a new tab)
This is the view as filed on 28 Feb 2019, not a statement of what the author thinks today.
About this letter
Jeffrey C. Smith, managing member of Starboard Value, signed this letter to the shareholders of Bristol-Myers Squibb on 28 February 2019. Bristol-Myers had announced its intention to acquire Celgene for approximately $91 billion in cash and stock, which Starboard calls one of the largest ever pharmaceutical mergers. Starboard said it would vote all its shares against the proposals at the special meeting scheduled for 12 April 2019, would solicit other shareholders to do the same, and had nominated a slate of directors for the 2019 annual meeting should the deal be voted down.
The letter opens with Bristol-Myers' share price record against its peers and the market, then argues its position under five headings: the product Celgene depends on, the pipeline expected to replace it, the diligence process, the company's presentation of the deal's value, and the alternatives open to an independent Bristol-Myers.
Why read it
A rare activist case against a merger built on product economics, showing how patent expiry, pipeline risk and diligence timing can be weighed against a headline deal.
What to notice
- 1
The patent cliff is the centrepiece: Revlimid, a small molecule drug with about $9.7 billion of 2018 sales and over 60% of Celgene's revenue, faced generic competition from 2022, and Starboard shows small molecule sales falling far faster than biologics after exclusivity ends.
Continue the investment thesis
See the 3 remaining takeaways on what this investor is arguing and why, and every analysis across the Letters & Theses library.
Checking what you can open…
“Bristol-Myers is knowingly acquiring a massive patent cliff”
Companies discussed
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (BMY)
- Celgene Corporation (CELG)
Topics
- capital allocation
- valuation
- risk
- governance
- strategy
L3VLUP does not host this document. It belongs to Starboard Value and is a public SEC filing; the notes above are L3VLUP’s reading of it.
More from Starboard Value
The same argument, elsewhere
- JANA Partners' 2017 letter to EQT stockholders opposing the Rice acquisition · JANA Partners
- Markel Group's 2023 letter to business partners · Markel Group
- Southeastern Asset Management's letter to the Dell board (February 2013) · Southeastern Asset Management
- Berkshire Hathaway's 2005 letter to shareholders · Berkshire Hathaway