L3VLUP
Letters & Theses

Carley Cunniff, Richard Cunniff, Robert Goldfarb and Bill Ruane · Sequoia Fund

Sequoia Fund's 2001 letter to shareholders, written after Enron

Covers FY2001Published 19 Feb 2002Filed 28 Feb 2002Investor letter · Investment

The view as filed on 28 Feb 2002, not a statement of what the author thinks today.

What to notice

  1. 1

    The letter argues that security analysis had become an exercise in separating truth from half-truths, and that the incentives of executives, directors and auditors would now push towards more honest reporting.

Continue the investment thesis

See the 2 remaining takeaways on what this investor is arguing and why, and every analysis across the Letters & Theses library.

Checking what you can open…

Why read it

A concentrated value fund explaining, weeks after Enron, why reported earnings and economic earnings differ and why it expected that gap to narrow.

About this letter

The four principals of Sequoia Fund's manager, Ruane, Cunniff & Co., signed this letter on 19 February 2002, and it opens the fund's annual report for 2001, filed with the SEC on form N-30D, the form funds used before N-CSR. The fund returned about 10% in a year when the S&P 500 fell by about 12%.

The letter is short, and most of it is about Enron, which had filed for bankruptcy in December. The managers set the scandal beside the attacks of September 11th as a dividing line, and argue that self-interest as much as regulation will push chief executives, directors, audit committees and accounting firms to behave differently. They also explain why they keep large positions in a few companies, and why they found few new purchases in 2001: after a decade of gains, valuations still looked generous to them.

Companies

  • Enron

Themes

  • governance
  • concentration
  • valuation
  • long term thinking

L3VLUP does not host this document. It belongs to Sequoia Fund and is a public SEC filing; the notes above are L3VLUP’s reading of it.