L3VLUP
Financing schedules · in 1 model

Covenant compliance and headroom

Leverage, interest cover, fixed charge cover, EBITDA cushion.

By Surojit Chakraverti, founder of L3VLUP and an investor running a long-short healthcare and technology equities strategy.

On this subject: covenant compliance and headroom.Updated 1 October 2026

Part of credit and restructuring models, with the models, labs and guides around it.

What it does

The maintenance tests in a credit agreement, computed each period against their levels. Total net leverage is tested against a maximum that steps down as the loan seasons; interest cover is EBITDA over cash interest; fixed charge cover is EBITDA less capex and cash taxes, over cash interest plus scheduled amortisation. Each is also expressed as an EBITDA cushion, the share of EBITDA that could be lost before the test breaks, so the tightest test is visible at a glance and comparable across all three.

Where it lives

The same schedule in each model that carries it, with the rows to open. Open a model in the browser, go to the sheet, and click the lines.

Credit model
  • Assumptions, rows 42–44: Maximum total net leverage, Minimum interest cover, Minimum fixed charge cover
  • Covenants, rows 6–8: Actual net leverage, Covenant maximum, Leverage headroom (EBITDA cushion)
  • Covenants, rows 11–12: Actual interest cover, Interest cover headroom (EBITDA cushion)
  • Covenants, rows 15–17: Fixed charges, Actual fixed charge cover, Fixed charge headroom (EBITDA cushion)
  • Covenants, rows 20–22: Tightest EBITDA cushion, Tightest test, Covenant breach flag

What a reviewer looks for

  • Ratios shown with no headroom.
  • Fixed charges that leave out scheduled amortisation.
  • Net leverage netting cash the agreement does not let you net.

Learn it, then build it

Vocabulary: Covenant, EBITDA Cushion, Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (FCCR), Interest Coverage Ratio.

Other financing schedules