L3VLUP
Letters & Theses
Startup & FounderFounder letter

Spotify's 2018 listing letter from Daniel Ek

Written by
Daniel Ek
Organisation
Spotify
Published
28 Feb 2018
Sector
Audio streaming

Read the original at sec.gov (opens in a new tab)

About this letter

Daniel Ek, Spotify's co-founder, chief executive and chairman, wrote this note for the registration statement on form F-1 that Spotify Technology S.A. filed with the SEC on 28 February 2018. The filing was made in connection with a direct listing of the company's ordinary shares on the NYSE, and the letter, headed 'Our Path', sits just before the business section.

Ek opens with the two passions he has had since the age of four, music and technology, and says he built Spotify because music was too important to let piracy take down the industry. He lists the company's values, states its mission to unlock the potential of human creativity, and describes an old model in which artists needed a label, a recording studio and terrestrial radio, giving way to one in which they produce and release their own music.

Why read it

It shows a founder explaining a two-sided marketplace through the earnings of its suppliers, the creators, and committing to long-term thinking ahead of a direct listing.

What to notice

  1. 1

    Ek describes a deliberate order for recommendation: start with human creativity, add expertise and understanding, then apply algorithms, in contrast to companies that rely entirely on data.

Continue with L3VLUP analysis

Unlock the 3 remaining takeaways on this letter, and every analysis across the full Letters & Theses library.

Checking what you can open…

“We really do believe that we can improve the world, one song at a time.”
Daniel Ek, 28 Feb 2018

Companies discussed

  • Spotify Technology S.A. (SPOT)

Topics

  • strategy
  • business model
  • product
  • long term thinking
  • technology shifts
Read the original at sec.gov (opens in a new tab)

L3VLUP does not host this document. It belongs to Spotify; the notes above are L3VLUP’s reading of it.

The same argument, elsewhere