L3VLUP
Atlas

FrameworkCase studyAccountingValuationFounders and companies

An adjusted metric is an argument about what should not count

WeWork: Or the Making and Breaking of a $47 Billion Unicorn · 2021

The idea

Every non-GAAP figure is a sentence that begins with 'ignoring'. Sometimes the thing ignored is genuinely one-off and the adjusted number is more useful. Sometimes the thing ignored is the cost of running the business. WeWork's community adjusted EBITDA excluded the costs of opening and marketing the locations the company existed to open, which turned a loss into a profit on paper. The test for any adjustment is the same: would a buyer of the whole company get to ignore this cost? If not, the adjustment is an argument, and you should know who is making it and why.

Judge an adjustment by whether an owner of the whole business would also get to ignore the cost.

When it works

Reading any earnings release, pitch deck or S-1 that leads with a non-GAAP measure.

When it may fail

Adjustments are often honest, and stock-based compensation is a real debate rather than a trick. The habit is to reconcile, not to dismiss.

How to use it

Rebuild the adjusted figure back to GAAP line by line and label each add-back as recurring, one-off or an argument. The size of the third column is what to talk about.

Where it came from

Documentary WeWork: Or the Making and Breaking of a $47 Billion Unicorn · 2021

What the source says. A valuation story from first round to withdrawn IPO, with community adjusted EBITDA as the single best example of an adjusted metric built to flatter.

Find it on the shelf Written from L3VLUP’s own notes on the work · reviewed 2026-10-16

Connected ideas

Concepts

Put it to work on L3VLUP

More like this