A hedge fund is a legal structure and a fee arrangement, not an investment approach. What one actually does is set by its strategy, and the strategies have less in common than the shared name implies. A global macro fund and a statistical arbitrage fund are as different as a law firm and a shipping company. Knowing which you are applying to determines everything about how you prepare.
The single idea underneath all of them
Every hedge fund strategy is an attempt to isolate a return that does not simply come from the market going up. That is what hedged means: not that risk is absent, but that a specific unwanted exposure has been removed so that what remains is the bet the manager wants to be paid for.
A long-short equity fund removes market direction to be left with stock selection. A relative value fund removes the level of rates to be left with the relationship between two instruments. A merger arbitrageur removes almost everything except the question of whether a deal closes. Once you see the pattern, the strategies stop being a list to memorise.
The strategies, side by side
| Strategy | The bet | Main risk | Typical horizon |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long-short equity | Stock selection, long the good, short the bad | Factor and crowding risk; shorts squeezing | Months to years |
| Global macro | Rates, currencies, commodities and indices on a macro view | Being right too early; carry while waiting | Weeks to quarters |
| Event driven | A corporate event completing as expected | The event breaking or being delayed | Weeks to months |
| Merger arbitrage | The spread between the offer and the market price | Deal break, and regulatory intervention | Weeks to months |
| Distressed | The recovery value of troubled debt or post-restructuring equity | Process risk, illiquidity, legal outcomes | Quarters to years |
| Relative value and fixed income arb | A price relationship reverting | Leverage; relationships widening before they revert | Days to months |
| Convertible arbitrage | Cheap embedded optionality in a convertible bond | Credit and liquidity; borrow availability | Weeks to months |
| Credit long-short | Mispriced corporate credit | Spread widening and default timing | Months |
| Quantitative and systematic | A statistical edge repeated many times | Crowding and regime change | Microseconds to months |
| Activist | A change the manager forces on a company | Time; public failure; concentration | Years |
| Multi-strategy | Many of the above in risk-controlled pods | Correlated drawdowns; capital reallocation | Varies by pod |
Long-short equity, in the detail that matters
This is where most candidates apply, and the vocabulary is worth being precise about. Gross exposure is long plus short as a share of capital and measures how much is at work. Net exposure is long minus short and measures how much market direction remains. A fund running 150 per cent gross and 20 per cent net is taking a lot of stock-specific risk and very little market risk.
The shape of the book tells you what the fund believes about itself. A market-neutral fund holds net exposure near zero and is claiming pure selection skill. A long-biased fund runs 40 to 70 per cent net and is claiming selection plus a view that markets rise. Sector specialists go deep in one industry; generalists go wide and rely on a repeatable process.
Pod shops and the single-manager alternative
The most consequential structural division in the industry is not strategy but organisation. A multi-strategy platform allocates capital to many small teams, each with a tight risk budget, a defined drawdown limit and a payout linked to their own book. A single-manager fund has one investment process, one chief investment officer and a team of analysts feeding it.
The difference matters enormously to a junior candidate. A pod gives fast responsibility, transparent economics and a short leash: a drawdown of a few per cent can end a team. A single-manager fund offers slower progression, more mentoring, a longer horizon and compensation tied to the whole fund rather than to your own names. Neither is better. They suit different temperaments, and saying which suits you, and why, is a strong answer to why this fund.
What each strategy asks you in an interview
- Long-short equity: a stock pitch, a short pitch, and the questions around them on sizing, catalysts and what would make you wrong.
- Global macro: a view on rates, inflation, a currency or a policy path, and the trade expression of it. They care more about how you would structure the trade than about the forecast.
- Event driven and merger arb: a live deal, the spread, the probability of completion and the downside if it breaks. Regulatory reasoning is tested directly.
- Distressed: the capital structure, where value breaks, and what each class recovers. Knowing the waterfall cold is non-negotiable.
- Credit: spread mathematics, covenants, and why a bond and an equity can disagree about the same company.
- Quantitative: probability, statistics, coding and research design. The stock pitch does not appear.
- Multi-strategy: the pod interview is the strategy interview, plus a heavy emphasis on risk discipline and on whether you can be sized down without arguing.
How to identify a fund strategy before you apply
Public filings of long equity positions in the United States show the long book of larger managers with a delay, which is enough to see concentration, sector tilt and turnover. Regulatory registration documents describe the strategy in the manager own words. Investor letters that circulate publicly show the reasoning rather than only the holdings.
Read those, then write one sentence: this fund runs a concentrated long-biased book in industrials with roughly twenty positions and a two-year holding period. If you can write that sentence, the "why us" answer writes itself, and if you cannot, you are not ready for the call.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between gross and net exposure?
Gross is longs plus shorts as a percentage of capital and measures how much is at work. Net is longs minus shorts and measures remaining market direction. A book at 150 per cent gross and 20 per cent net is taking substantial stock-specific risk and very little market risk.
What is a pod shop?
A multi-strategy platform that allocates capital to many small independent teams, each with its own risk limit, drawdown stop and payout tied to its own book. It offers fast responsibility and transparent economics in exchange for a short leash, since a modest drawdown can end a team.
Which hedge fund strategy is best to start a career in?
Long-short equity is the widest entry point and the most transferable, because fundamental analysis of companies applies everywhere. Event driven and credit suit people from restructuring or leveraged finance, and quantitative strategies are a separate hiring pipeline with different tests entirely.
Do all hedge funds ask for a stock pitch?
Fundamental funds do, including long-short equity, event driven and most credit seats. Quantitative and systematic funds do not: those interviews test probability, statistics, coding and research design instead, and a pitch would be beside the point.
Related guides
Want this applied to your recruiting?
Reading is the easy part. For practitioner feedback tailored to your situation, work 1:1 with Suro.