LTM (Last Twelve Months)
The most recent twelve months of trading, built by adding the latest interim period to the last full year and subtracting the same interim period a year earlier. Also called trailing twelve months. It is what a multiple is quoted on when the question is what the business has actually done, as opposed to what a broker expects it to do.
LTM (Last Twelve Months) · the mechanism
30 sec read
Build the last twelve months from a set of filings, and say when you would reach for it rather than calendarising.
Where it comes up. A VP asks for the leverage multiple on the trailing twelve months, four months after a year end, when the last annual figure is already stale.
Take the last full fiscal year
Start from the most recent audited annual figure. This is the anchor, and it is the only part of the calculation that is not going to move.
Add the interim just reported, subtract the same interim last year
Add the year-to-date period the company has most recently published, then subtract the identical period from the prior year. The subtraction is the step people skip, and skipping it double-counts those months.
Check what happened inside the window
An acquisition or disposal in the last twelve months makes the raw arithmetic a mixture of two different companies. Adjust it pro forma before quoting a multiple on it, and say that you have.
Worked through
A 31 December year end. FY2025 EBITDA $400m. Nine months to September 2026: $340m. Nine months to September 2025: $290m.
- Last full fiscal year
- $400m
- Add the interim just reported
- +$340m
- Subtract the same interim a year earlier
- −$290m
LTM EBITDA is $450m, covering October 2025 to September 2026. Quote the multiple on the stale $400m instead and a business at $3.6bn of enterprise value prints 9.0x rather than 8.0x, which is a full turn of imaginary expense.
Check yourselfYour peer set has one company that has just reported half-year figures and three that have not reported since their year end. Do you use LTM?
Answer once you have one →
Not on its own, and this is the trap. Putting one company on a twelve months to June basis and three on a twelve months to December basis means the column is no longer comparable, which is the exact problem LTM does not solve. Either take all four to their last reported full year and calendarise, or use forward figures throughout. Whichever you choose, the page has to say so.
Be able to say this back next week
- Built it as last full year, plus the interim just reported, less the same interim a year earlier
- Said LTM moves the window forward and calendarisation aligns the clock, and that they are different jobs
- Checked for acquisitions inside the window before quoting a multiple on it
Why LTM (Last Twelve Months) matters in interviews
LTM is the figure a multiple is quoted on when the question is what a business has actually done rather than what somebody expects it to do, which makes it the honest denominator in a comps table and the one a buyer underwrites against. Interviewers use it to check two things at once: whether you can build it from a set of filings without being handed the number, and whether you understand that it is a different tool from calendarisation rather than a version of it.
How it works in practice
The build is one line: last full fiscal year, plus the year-to-date interim period just reported, less the same interim period from the prior year. A company with a 31 December year end that has just reported the nine months to September gives LTM = FY plus 9M this year less 9M last year. Every figure comes from filings the company has published, so nothing in an LTM is an estimate.
It exists because a fiscal year end is an accident of history and a valuation is not. Four months after year end, the last reported annual figure is sixteen months stale at its oldest point. LTM refreshes the denominator every time the company reports, which is why it is the standard basis for a leveraged finance quote, a credit agreement covenant test and most transaction multiples.
LTM and calendarisation solve different problems and are routinely confused. LTM answers "how recent is this number" and moves the window forward in time for one company. Calendarisation answers "are these companies on the same clock" and aligns several companies to a common year end. A comps page can need both: LTM to make the trailing column current, calendarisation to make the forward column comparable.
The two also differ in what they are built from. LTM is arithmetic on reported figures and is exact. Calendarisation blends two fiscal years by a month weight and is therefore an approximation, because the weight assumes trading is spread evenly across the year. That difference in precision is the reason a practitioner reaches for LTM whenever the reported periods allow it, and calendarises only when they do not.
The refinement most candidates have never met: where quarterly data exists, a calendar period can be assembled largely from quarters rather than weighted from annual figures. Add the whole reporting quarters that fall inside the target year and weight only the part-quarters at each end. Because fiscal quarters rarely align with calendar quarters, this does not make the figure exact, but it confines the even-month assumption to two or three months instead of applying it across all twelve. On a business with a genuine trading peak that is worth a couple of per cent, which is a fraction of a turn on the multiple and enough to matter in a tight comps range.
What candidates get wrong
- Adding the interim period without subtracting the prior-year interim, which double-counts those months and inflates the figure.
- Building LTM from a balance sheet line. Only flow items have an LTM; net debt and share count are taken at the most recent reporting date.
- Forgetting that acquisitions and disposals inside the window make LTM a mixture of two different companies. A pro forma adjustment is needed before the multiple means anything, and this is exactly what a credit agreement will argue about.
- Quoting an LTM multiple against a peer set on forward figures. A trailing multiple looks lower than a forward one for any growing business, and comparing across the two makes a company look cheap when it is not.
- Treating LTM and calendarised figures as interchangeable. LTM moves the window; calendarisation aligns the clock. Using one where the other is needed produces a number that answers a question nobody asked.
LTM (Last Twelve Months): frequently asked questions
What does LTM mean in finance?
Last twelve months: the most recent twelve months of trading, regardless of where the fiscal year end falls. It is built by taking the last full fiscal year, adding the year-to-date interim period just reported, and subtracting the same interim period from the prior year. It is also called trailing twelve months, or TTM, and the two are the same thing.
How do you calculate LTM EBITDA?
FY EBITDA, plus the year-to-date EBITDA in the latest interim report, less the year-to-date EBITDA for the same period a year earlier. For a December year end after a nine-month report: FY2025 plus 9M 2026 less 9M 2025. All three figures are reported, so the result is exact rather than estimated. Where the company has bought or sold a business inside the window, the raw arithmetic mixes two different companies and needs a pro forma adjustment first.
What is the difference between LTM and calendarisation?
They answer different questions. LTM moves the window forward in time for one company, so the number reflects the most recent twelve months rather than a stale fiscal year. Calendarisation aligns several companies with different year ends onto a common one, so their figures can be compared. LTM is exact arithmetic on reported periods; calendarisation weights two fiscal years by months of overlap and is therefore an approximation. A single comps page often uses both.
Why do lenders use LTM EBITDA?
Because a leverage covenant has to be tested against something current and verifiable. LTM refreshes with every reporting period, uses only figures the borrower has actually published, and cannot be moved by changing an estimate. Credit agreements then spend considerable length defining which adjustments to that LTM figure are permitted, which is where the argument about "adjusted" EBITDA actually happens.
Go deeper
This term comes up constantly in valuation interviews and on the desk.
DCF interview questions guideRelated Valuation terms
Go further than reading
The written material is free. These are the ways to get it applied to your own work.
CV Review by a Human
Written margin-note feedback on structure, impact bullets and ATS-readability. Reviewed by Suro, not an AI score.
$25 48h turnaround
Cover Letter Review by a Human
Line-by-line review of argument, tailoring and tone, with a rewritten opening as a worked example.
$50 48h turnaround
Inner Circle
Membership: premium tools, role intros, the private community and members-only intel.
$79 /month
Browse the full glossary — 188 finance recruiting and technical terms, in plain English.